Desk rejection reddit. And these things take time.

Desk rejection reddit You don't really need any prior experience for help desk since it's more of any entry level position. I'm currently on Day 11 and it's still "under consideration TU Delft masters in Robotics desk rejection on basis of CGPA . I was sitting at my desk and got a rejection letter. I have a built in desk nook next to my closet in my room, and I just padded the walls inside the booth and hung up a curtain on the outside of the booth. I’ve also had the case of waiting three months for editor and desk rejection so just forget about the paper for a while. Short Answer: Desk rejects are quick, but if it goes out to review, then rejections tend to take as long as any other first-round outcome. Introduction. x), 5 Jahre Berufserfahrung (Projektleiter, seit etwas über einem Jahr Vertriebsingenieur), davor 2. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. ask if they have any feedback or tips and maybe give some light positive feedback of my experience Understanding Desk Rejection. Gaming sub journal for getting sent out for review, and odds for acceptance after? I was hoping the desk rejection is a big hinch where most rejected manuscripts get rejected, but stats would be awesome! Edit: Title should Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Congrats and good luck. Given that that desk is usually manned by someone whose main task is to keep people away from the decision makersthe new title might be more apt. Or check it out in the app stores   One of my old bosses used to allow himself 10 minutes to yell at rejection letters, and call the reviewers idiots, before moving on and improving the manuscript, that worked for him! First desk rejection help. e. I had to rewrite it as well in that time because it had been so long, new data had emerged (it's a systematic review). I'm currently on Day 11 and it's still "under consideration" with no reviewers contacted or any editorial decision. Hi everyone, I am a PhD student and close to finish my degree. How have you dealt with rejection in the past, and how do you get The rejection sucks and there’s nothing that makes it suck less but at least try to not take it as a poor reflection on you and more just a system that’s far far far from perfect. My first PhD paper was under review for 15 months before I withdrew it because the journal couldn't get reviewers. But no one around me has received any email related to desk rejections (like if they passed or not) yet, nor has anyone on twitter or reddit stated that. Enjoy your holidays. All we ask for is a chance at reviews. . Do your research on journals' scope to minimize desk rejects. As she was being walked out her boss had the balls to ask if she had time for a few questions about her workload before she left. If your paper underwent the review process, you have hopefully great feedback to make it even better for the next journal! Don't give up! Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Is it safe to assume that this will be an unfortunate desk rejection, i. Top tier journals often get desk rejects out within a week, which is Yesterday we received a desk rejection notice from NeurIPS because our paper is several lines over the 8-page limit. Or check it out in the app stores   Or, could the length of my mansuscript be a possible reason for rejection? Could a manuscript be overqualified for a journal? Our journals have ridiculously high rejection rates, and a lot of papers get desk rejections with no or minimal comments. I wanted to ask for some advice on how to interpret the feedback. Forbidden” any photo I upload. Now, two years have passed, and that stupid paper only got so far 15 citations or so. More posts you may like As I understand, this may indicate that the peer-review process is complete and the editor(s) could be deciding whether to accept/reject my manuscript. This typically occurs when the manuscript does not meet the journal’s scope, quality standards, or ethical guidelines. The desk isn't right for me, the work seem to be endless, going into work early for a head start, skipping breaks, working partially during lunch, staying late a few mins to finish touches still doesn't get the work completed. Rejection after peer review is based on whether your work is robust enough - in the view of the reviewers. , is not being sent out for review? the journal. My job progression is as follows Got a bachelors degree in film in 2011 worked as a marketing video editor and producer for a small marketing company but I needed to make more money Rejection is never easy, but the way it’s delivered can make a significant difference. In all cases, I got editorial desk rejections. I submitted a paper yesterday afternoon and I woke up to a desk rejection email this morning (less than 24 hours later). I’ve applied for a TON of customer service jobs and every time I get the rejection email “we’re moving forward” blah blah. This work means the world to my team. A Reddit community for those who work from home! Helpful tips and discussions on This subreddit is temporarily closed in protest of Reddit killing third party apps, see /r/ModCoord and /r/Save3rdPartyApps for more information. While it is always a bummer to have a desk rejection, especially from a journal you perceive to be a good fit, nothing you describe sounds unfair here. Hi all, new to TOS, my orders keep getting rejected and don't include additional details to know why. Telegram. Tumblr. I desk reject somewhere in the region of 30-40% of submissions. (None of these is you personally necessarily. Most journal usually do not reconsider resubmission. He does maybe 10 hours of actual work per week because he does mainly tier 2 and 3 tickets and he knows the system inside out and backwards. 03 for the past year and I've gotten my resume and cover letter appraised from my peers and parents. We got accepted with minor revisions at the first journal we submitted to (~14 IF), though we queried them beforehand to see if they were interested (they were) so that lowered the chances of a desk rejection. Do you have any idea if it is possible to submit to the same journal again after showing enough proof regarding my Got a rejection email today for one of my papers. 500 bucks in building materials can make you pretty much whatever desk you want, short of a Mahogany masterpiece. How to Handle Rejection - A Senior Editor's Guide upvotes · comments. Felt a lot less worse and got working on the manuscript again 2 days later. I realized resizing warps the photo so I went photo shooting yesterday and made sure the settings on my camera were correct. But then you get back up and move on. Digg. A desk rejection, particularly at a journal like nature where there are a lot of submission, can definitely take more than a week. Rejection after review is almost surely because of the reviewers' decision, regardless on whether the topic of your paper suits their journal or not. We conducted our I need a solid headset with preferably stereo speakers (and preferably circumaural if such a thing exists in the professional world) with really good noise rejection. Welcome to r/LearnJapanese, *the* hub on Reddit for learners of the Japanese Language. But I have to admit, the desk rejection was both disappointing and relieving, because, if desk rejection takes this long, then how long would it take to actually get published? 1. 21 votes, 10 comments. You get two reviews. Hi Leute, bin aktuell auf Jobsuche im Raum NRW, aber bisher hagelts nur Absagen. Hearing "No" frees you to move on. While the research has novelty, it is on a now curable disease in specialty A (meaning there is no more debate on whether to treat) and our primary outcome is associated with, but not entirely tied to, clinical improvement in specialty B. I have a friend who works service desk for a enterprise organization. Now I'm confused Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . Is this what usually editors say to please authors even when the papers have quality issues (or any other problems like out of scope)? My favourite manuscript was desk rejected by three journals in the space of two weeks, which was super deflating at the time. As an example, I manage a suite of 6 journals and our flagship journal receives approximately 1200 submissions a year and the acceptance rate is about 9%. Extremely frustrating since desk rejections don't give you the kind of feedback that a reviewer rejection would to improve the manuscript. mid-level providers, practice managers, administrators, billers and front desk staff members have questions about coding. " Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I've applied to 8 student jobs this past semester to various positions from Desk Assistants to TA's and Research Aides, however, I keep getting rejected. Email. IT help desk is full time, assuming regular school hours, starting is $20-$23/hr. Since she thought this might happen, she cleaned out out her desk last week. CSCareerQuestions protests in The extremely unhelpful front desk employee told me that I was never accepted and that essentially I was lying about being accepted in person. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. Traffic noise, stuff going on in the house, all that certainly gets picked up on the mic. Got on Reddit, and asked people how many rejections it takes to get their first article out. After reviewing your application and considering all of our open positions, we think this is the best fit, We always keep an open mind during the course of the interview process, but at this time we are primarily considering you for TDO. Even though clearing the overall criteria of 75 percent for indian students with a cgpa of 8. It's gotten good feedback when I presented it at conferences and people who have read it have found it interesting. There's unfortunately still a significant portion of luck involved to get proper reviewers who take the time to understand your work and make constructive comments, but those do happen. Focusing specifically on English teaching in Japan, you really do not need to take rejection from any of them personally. StandingDesk stands (heh) against Reddit corporate takeovers but this sub's current state would be better than whatever Reddit Inc would do, so. Sometimes it takes time. Reply reply As an official Fidelity customer care channel, our community is the best way to get help on Reddit with your questions about investing with Fidelity You will sometimes have to figure out that what the rejection says isn’t the actual rejection reason, but that comes with experience. Keep in mind that if you submit to a Q1 journal, the acceptance rate is quite low, so don't take rejection personally. That said, it's a smaller paper from a side project, with a fairly straightforward story. r/StandingDesk. If it does not suit the journal, it will be rejected without review to begin with (desk rejection). Thanks a lot for your inputs, everyone. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. I've maintained a GPA of 4. The scope of the journals was not an issue here because very similar studies were published before and were heavily cited in my own literature review. In brief. And these things take time. The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. I was expecting a desk rejection letter soon Nature Communications (passed editor, strong rejection by reviewers) Nature Nanotechnology (passed editor, mild rejection by reviewers) Nature (reject w/out review) Science (reject w/out review) Nature Nanotechnology (awaiting results) We are up to 7 rejections now after 1 year of resubmitting, rewriting, and performing new experiments. Like any other rejection in your life. Gaming headsets have all been a little staticy on the play back. (By minimal I mean the kind of fluff already mentioned, "the volume of submissions is especially high", "we're currently not accepting any further papers on topic/philosopher x", and so forth. However, the paper was on doing JOINs with TIME SERIES with GPUs. I’ve tried many different photos. But then go back, reread and look for any possible improvements, and then send it off. Many years ago, I applied for a Help Desk position at a company that was much closer to where I lived (so shorter commute was a big driving factor) through a recruiter. Posted by u/BigBoyRusty95 - 20,675 votes and 543 comments I had an article that, objectively, was deserving of publication in a high profile journal. But it happens all the time. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets And if you want to get published at top journals, you must do it or face desk rejection. I'm sorry to hear that. Rejection doesn’t equal failure!! Failure only happens when you quit trying to succeed!! That also means that you weren’t meant to have this position. I’m in the market for a new desk, I spend basically 10-12 hours sitting at my desk. You take a couple hours to be disappointed or upset and mourn the rejection. Posted by u/kostas_k84 - 2 votes and 10 comments It was clearly communicated what phase 1 entails. Get what you can out of the reviewer comments and submit to the next journal - perhaps you need to explain the motivation a bit better. Artwork rejection :( I keep getting a message saying “upload failed. She seemed very happy talking to you (which we don't want to read into, but at the same time, you obviously don't creep her out or anything). The reason given is that the paper does not fit the scope of the journal despite the content being closely related. A few days later, I was informed that I was rejected because I was "overqualified". I've found that cover letters can literally be the difference between acceptance and desk rejection at many Q1 journals. You can receive them for good, bad, and downright silly reasons - but it's a guarantee one way or the other. 7 weeks. The feedback we received was generic, asking for more experiments, ablation studies, and citing unclear writing and motivation blah blah. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. But I find it unprofessional to reject a revised manuscript on Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Advertise on Reddit; Shop Give special attention to how you're drafting your cover letters; that's your chance to tell the editor your big findings and why it is a good fit for their journalthen they can read the manuscript with that in mind. And I am reminded how that feeling of disappointment with yourself is 100x worse than any rejection could be. “DESINO L Shaped Gaming Desk 59 inch Computer Corner Desk PC Writing Table Gamer Workstation for Home Office” Edit: as far as other desks, I’ve resorted to building my own. He was extremely helpful, and told me to contact him directly and to ignore the front desk staff. The company I work at posted an internship recently; unfortunately it was filled internally by a Also, learn to reject early and quickly. However, you have to be a very special breed to take a rejected paper and submit it unchanged to another I am just curious and want to ask if anyone else applied for ASU MCS Fall 2023 session and got a reject already? My application went into review on 1st October and was rejected on 5th October. It’s a data science paper based on quantitative analysis. We've received your resume and would like to consider you for the Trading Desk Operations (TDO) role. Our interdisciplinary clinical research has been desk-rejected for 6 times in a row. Dealing with Rejection . I'm sorry you had a rough outright rejection from eLife. I know others who have had similarly difficult experiences before peer review at eLife. Motorbikes related posts here. Looking for alternative public health journals but lacking confidence after the first rejection. But, it's important to also be able to differentiate between a clear cut rejection and a situation where even though you got rejected in the moment the girl is still entertaining you. Learning that papers get published even after 10+ rejections, I'm gonna guess that rejection is just a part of the process and that I should just go back to the drawing board and figure out how to improve my manuscript. So recently got an ipad and the pencil (6th gen ipad and 1st gen pencil) to work more efficiently (i can't stand sitting at my desk all day) and the palm rejection is being kinda weird? I have no issues with it on the canvas cuz it messes Now 6 months after submission, I have just received the rejection. Users equip NFT Sneakers – walk, jog or run outdoors to earn tokens and NFTs. Or check it out in the app stores I know that the desk reject process at Nature-branded journals is a bit more complex than moving a paper from the inbox to the circular file; there is a requirement that all papers are read fully and that decisions (including desk rejections) are View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit [D] NeurIPS Desk Rejection on Aug 4 BECAUSE OF OTHER'S DUAL SUBMISSION! Any thoughts about this new desk rejection policy? Related Topics Machine learning Computer science Information & communications technology Applied science Formal science Technology Science comments We've not-so-recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS, which, after passing quality checks, has remained at the 'Under Editorial Board Review' stage for 33 days now. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets Paper at risk of desk rejection due to missing volunteer. Many if not most papers get desk rejected by at least one journal, so it does not mean it is unpublishable garbage. (not just reddit) and look up salary benchmarks. Or check it out in the app stores   I stood in the fancy lobby, marveling at the small water feature they had installed next to the receptionist's desk, having been told that the manager who was to interview me was on his way. A rejection is no longer based on relevance to the journal's scope or the impact of your work, but to their bottom line. Some nature editors are lot slower than others. He is paid 80k a year and its totally remote. Within a couple days, I received an immediate desk rejection The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. For relationship rejection: Rejection is a favor. The reason is that we didn’t provide proofs that one of the authors has enough experience in this topic. I called, got transferred multiple times, once to a credit card company. As a reviewer, I'd insta-reject any RNR that didn't have one. They apparently got 150% of last year's submissions. You submit to a highly specialized paper to a journal. My manuscript was under consideration for 43 days! And "editor decision started" for 7 days. Don't be like me I'm 37 years old. This year, despite two acceptances, we faced one rejection (with the fourth review missing) without clear reasons or useful feedback. Then, after desk rejection, suddenly this journal is not worth citing anymore? Too personal and too unprofessional. After several months of work and seeking advice from various experts, we significantly improved the paper. Ask Question Asked 1 year, 6 months ago. After each rejection I sent it to a journal with a higher IF, until it went in to the second highest journal in the field and was accepted after one round of revisions. This number is Best mic for rejection is the one that is off or muted on the desk General consensus would be that less sensitive mics (dynamics) when given a strong input signal (strong singer for eg) reject better than highly sensitive mics (Condensers) if there is a lot of stage wash. g. the companies are wanting a lot for very little, and most all of them are not even sending automatic rejection emails anymore even after you're in their interview process. So if you haven't heard anything from a Within a couple days, I received an immediate desk rejection saying that the paper is not developed enough, nothing else. ” This required nothing from them (or so they thought, muahahaha!). I take at least 15 minutes for coffee, and sit in silence. Academics are trained to find flaws in everything and be very critical. Indian Bikes Reddit community. Much better for the price. Valheim; Genshin Impact; Minecraft; Pokimane; Halo Infinite; Desk rejection is the worst! But you have to move on, target another journal, don't try to convince the 1st one to reconsider. Read a quite a few stories ranging all the way from no rejection to 13 rejections (and ending up in IF greater than the first). Exactly! And as long as you have the right attitude, girls will let you get away with a lot of things. LONG LIVE REDDITGIFTS! Editor here. This experience highlights how some people might choose to express their disinterest in a more hurtful manner. On January 24, 2022, Redditgifts was officially closed and we are no longer running exchanges. I responded immediately with: "Honest mistake, first-time NeurIPS submitters! Please give us a chance. The guest came back to desk saying that they wouldn’t give them the receipt and ask if I could speak with them. I worked on this paper for about 2 years by the time I submitted it. I think it's safe to say that other prestige journals (Science, Cell, PNAS) have similar desk reject rates. no title, abstract, list of authors (if they want them as seperate documents) --- the nice people at the journal, but most likely not anyone near the editor, will likely just send you a nice email and you can ask to withdraw (I missed something once, nice person emailed me). VK. I had to call the help desk to get the details. Every single one of the major companies are just a circus where the clowns wear suits. For me desk rejection is a trigger for sending another paper there. Reddit India bikes lovers gather here. Rejection doesn’t mean you did anything wrong at all, a lot Take a day or two off, embrace this rejection process, enhance the paper, resubmit it either to the same journal (Please change the title and modify the paper so it would have a chance to be read by new reviewers and don’t be like my supervisor who insisted on submitting the paper to the same journal with the same title and got it rejected Third year in Neuroscience. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Even if it is rejection. but also want to have some audio for some videos I occasionally record. I was actually surprised at this as I had researched this journal thoroughly and thought a desk rejection based on quality of research was much more likely considering this was a higher impact journal (not that I think that my research is bad, but I imagine high impact journals have the privilege of only accepting the best of the best). Easier said than done when in the moment, I know. That was a complete bs It's not always that bad and, as evertyhing in academia, field-dependent. This submission is summarily rejected because: - The paper is not formatted according to the NeurIPS requirements or it is not sufficiently anonymized. I completely agree. Or check it out in the app stores the paper was desk rejection, and third time was rejected and will not be possible to resubmit. Hoping to hop on a call, and we don't have to disclose identities, just to keep things private. I did research a lot and my work did align with the field on interest for the journal but I just wanna know if it's a no, how long before I know it? Outright rejecting? A few days to a couple of weeks. I’ve been applying for 6 months on and off (I’m also a teacher online making $10/hr and I also work for a chat/email desk online) but I’m looking for something more stable. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". Rejection rates at these journals generally reflect the percentage of people applying as stretch goals (i. Rejection is normal and can happen for various reasons, but most importantly "noise". View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I recently submitted a paper on which I worked on for quite a long time to a social sciences journal. I was hoping it had gone to peer review since it had been a month since submission, but it was just a long desk rejection. 3 days for a desk rejection is annoying; 6 months for rejection can be devastating to someone's timeline. I visited the admission office that same day and was fortunate enough to meet with the director. Without desk-rejection we will essentially overload reviewers and the risk of having low-quality reviews is very high. After that, I usually catch up on the Wikipedia homepage, weather, news, and Reddit. Or check it out in the app stores   Nature Desk Rejection Timeline? STEM First time submitted a manuscript to Nature and was told by colleagues that editorial/desk rejections come very fast within 2-3 business days. Then I submitted it to Science, it was rejected after the 1st round review, - 1 postive, 1 extremely negative. That means that journal was good enough for their precious work. A colleague of ours had submitted an article two days prior and received a desk rejection about two weeks ago. Or check it out in the app stores what great timing. It's quite a niche topic so I understand why: Quali study on the perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors of professional esports athletes when it comes to their health. I submitted my study to 5 journals b/w 1. I felt it didn't go well because it was relatively short. I went for a hike and am now on Reddit, drinking beer and eating crisps in bed (feeling quite disillusioned). I'm not sure but they may be checking all the desk rejects to make sure they are justified before informing. Posted by u/WaVeYgUrL - 44 votes and 10 comments View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit [iPad] palm rejection being wonky . Is such a long waiting period normal? Received this email for NIPS 2020 rejection and the reason for rejection is - 1. The worse case scenario is rejection You could also look for an internship as well. I just had a paper STEPN is a Web3 lifestyle app with Social-Fi and Game-Fi elements that uses a dual-token system. It will have to be positioned quite near the keyboard with as I have a small desk. Cars related discussion is not allowed Im in a field with a lot of desk rejects (doesn’t even get sent to reviewers), but I’ve still gotten all my manuscripts to land in decent journals. Mix. Nature Desk Rejection Timeline? First time submitted a manuscript to Nature and was told by colleagues that editorial/desk rejections come very fast within 2-3 business days. While I am appreciative that the review time was relatively short (~30 days), I suspect that this may indicate a desk-rejection is imminent. Reposting to correct title As title says - first submission to a prestigious journal and at the desk review stage (before it goes through any internal or peer review), they said its relevant to the journal and an important topic, but 'does not currently meet sufficient key criteria that would make it more likely to succeed in peer review'. I think some agencies are improving faster than others but recruitment processes are for sure a major weakness for the whole system and I think one we massively i stopped into local ikea today to show this reference image for my reception desk! business planner told me it was an ikea hack- use their desk and then build a ponywall in front of it and finish it with this slatboard facing (available at home depot). If I am desk rejecting your paper it is Ultimately, I realized how important rejections are for science and that the rejection wasn't about me as a person or what I was capable of (as others have said, there are many reasons for a rejection and not all are to do with the quality of the paper itself). All things related to automobiles that move on two wheels. My first paper also got rejected 3 times before settling on a new open access journal that is a sub-journal to a I recently got a desk rejection for a manuscript I submitted to a journal in the field of urban systems and analysis. I similarly had a completely fact-free desk rejection, which we appealed, and where other editors agreed with our criticism but said, "oh we don't think this has the impact for eLife anyway". If you have too many articles to handle, desk reject more of them and let the authors find someone else. Off the cuff my main reasons for desk rejection are; Plagiarism. OP got a bench rejection by the action editor without additional reviewers. 5 Jahre Werkstudent und 0. 12. My advisor—whose name is known by everyone in my field—gave me this same advice when I got my first desk rejection. " I received a desk rejection today from their editor. rejection: Sometimes rejection doesn't mean "Never," just "Not right now. 😂 I haven't heard of anyone who has received a desk reject but someone tweeted a supposed info from reviewers on the 12th that they have essentially finished that process and will start informing on desk rejects soon. 🏃🏾🏃‍♀️🏃🏻‍♂️ _____ Users can trade their NFTs on the in-app marketplace. As long as you arent some lecherous twat douche canoe, the worst thing that taking a respectful shot can do - is make that person feel good about themselves. An hour later a multiple attempts at getting someone who could help finally got the bill. If you get too emotionally connected to the inevitable cycle of rejection you will only end up damaging your mental health. Wᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ʀ/SGExᴀᴍs – the largest community on reddit discussing education and student life in Singapore Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I've been writing for as long as I can remember, but for the past few years, I've really been putting a foot forward toward publication through writing contests and submissions. Today's demand for certified professional coders (CPCs) is growing as many jobs in One option is that you could just miss some of the information they need. This year NeuRIPS has over 10000 submissions (double the size of ICML 2020), so even after desk-rejection phase, which assuming 85% of this amount will receive full reviewing process, we still have 8500 submissions left. Some general tips for dealing with paper rejection I summarized in a short video, perhaps it's useful to you: View community ranking In the Top 50% of largest communities on Reddit. Gaming. there should be an offer or rejection after this. ReddIt. ) Yes I applied directly got an interview did the interview. fun! (microbiology, virology). LINE. I just went through 8 desk rejections and ended up publishing in an open How do you deal with immediate desk rejections with no substantial reasoning provided? In line with the question, I am unsure whether or not the scientific results of my article were sufficient My review paper just got desk rejected a second time after waiting for 2 weeks. That's a normal timeframe for a rejection with reviews. If oth reviews recommend the paper to not to progress to phase 2 ( because there are issues which cannot be resolved within the review cycle), then the meta reviewer will take a I may have given you my gear/setup rundown before, but it's an AT4040 into an Apogee Duet 2. Some of the most cited papers in VLDB are on JOINs or TIME SERIES or GPUs. This subreddit is temporarily closed in protest of Reddit killing third party apps, see /r/ModCoord and /r/Save3rdPartyApps for more information. (🇮🇳-🏍️) Place for all Indian riders to discuss news, reviews and motorcycle trips. We've tested a couple headsets which have decent noise rejection while the wearer is speaking, but as soon as they fall silent the gain picks up and amplifies the background chatter. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. Today, I was told the paper got desk rejected since "I did not use the correct template and over used the margins". Print. Part of my job description is to interview and send rejection letters. The rejection Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive An exponential distribution seems likely, so the mean and standard deviation would be the same, and the probability of a desk rejection later than 3 weeks is about 17%, if the mean time to desk rejection is 1. All the manuscripts are automatically screened before I Y'all, I wouldn't work out with the sexiest guy in the world at 4 am. After two weeks, we received a desk rejection (without an invitation to resubmit), citing a lack of proper benchmarking and a narrow scope. A few minutes later, he shows up, refuses to I started help desk about 4 months ago and now I’m tech support with very low call volume and remote. Reasons of desk rejection. Modified 1 year, 4 months ago. If you have to get a rejection, it's always better to get the near-instant bench rejection so that you can turn the manuscript around to another journal where it might have a better chance. The pendulum CSCareerQuestions protests in solidarity with the developers who made third party reddit apps. E. I will use it for discord etc. Simply cut out the Conclusion. The editor is roughly familiar with your field, but not enough to know whether (a) you're just reinventing the wheel, or (b) you are interpreting your sources accurately. Over the past three weeks, NeurIPS 2020 program chairs have tasked area chairs (AC) and senior area chairs (SAC) with the job of summary rejection (aka desk-rejects): ACs did a light read of the papers and identified those they believed would not be accepted, and SACs cross-checked the selections, according to a NeurIPS blog post. 5 and 7. About an hour later someone from HR comes up to her and asked her to clean out her desk and leave immediately. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. I wished some wise elderly would prevent from doing that. When I sold forklifts, I would say, “I’ll be in your area tomorrow, so if it’s ok I’ll just take a look at your fleet and write up a service proposal to send you. Meanwhile most of my friends already have jobs. reddit's new API changes kill third party apps that offer accessibility features, mod tools, and other features not found in the first party app. Viber. I made some changes to the manuscript and submitted to another journal and Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. By the time I finish browsing Reddit, I'm either in a good mood or fired up, which makes me ready to check my email. Roughly 1hr20minutes to their central office. This can get sticky as there are shit reviewers out there. Sometimes it takes me a week after being assigned to even do a first read and desk reject or decide to send for review. That's pretty strange, I Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I’ve tried jpg, jpeg, heic, and even RGB formats. So, OP sends a paper to the journal. During this process, I realized a few things: My "fun" story about a paper: I submitted to journal X, and got a desk rejection, but with the editor saying they liked the paper and it might be a better fit at journal Y. Most common form of rejection I've had is editors not feeling the paper is a good fit (basically journals with high impact factor who only want the sexiest stuff). Just got a straight-up desk rejection of a recently submitted paper. My hotel is currently hiring. TU Delft is explicitly anal about cgpa criteria. It was then desk rejected by three other journals for being ever so slightly out of scope. If you’ve ever tried to get an appointment as an outside vendor with a decision maker, you fear At least it seems the paper went out for review (and this wasn't a desk rejection). So I submitted to journal Y, and got a desk rejection, but with the editor saying they liked the paper and it /r/secretsanta and Reddit Gifts were started in 2009 to provide a Secret Santa exchange for the Reddit community. Rejection Letter for Location Hello has anyone applied in California and received a letter of rejection for location stating "PC delivery proximity considerations of our at home programs due to the minimum wage requirements in Los Angeles County? What to expect from The reviewers got their review assignments, that means desk rejections are finished and authors should be notified. Post latest news, reviews, opinions, pics, etc here. Did not receive a rejection email and never emailed back asking them what happened (because usually if they don't reach out in few days it means rejection). 0 IF, starting with the highest and coming down with each rejection. 5 Jahre Masterand (MA im Unternehmen), nebenberufliche Promotion, L6S und MTM Zertifikate, sehr gute Work (Paid)11; Break; 23 hr/wk, 8 wk/yrCashier and Receptionist, Nail SalonGreeted customers and serviced front desk; organized cash register;janitorial jobs such as cleaning bathroom; answered calls and madeappointments Order Rejection Details . I had a desk reject at a mid-range journal and then someone told me to send it to a higher one and I got accepted with only minor revisions. This prepares you for the often inevitable rejection from the beginning. I got another manuscript rejection today too. Desk rejection due to insufficient space? Hi, I just got desk rejected and the reason provided was that there is insufficient space to publish. Obviously you have to be some what computer literate, they may ask you some very minor technical questions depending on the I’m so freaking annoyed. Hi there, does anyone work at the Trade Desk? I have a few questions and would love to pick your brain. We welcome anyone curious to learn more about unified connectivity and an API-led approach. Once I put the hand-written proposal together, I’d drop it on their desk in person with my business card. But get drunk tonight. It took them a month to send mine to review and three months to get reviewers comments in the first round of revisions. Instead, I try to ground myself before diving into technology. If the status goes from "With editor" directly to "Decision in process", that usually indicates a desk rejection If the review time is unusually short, that probably also indicates a rejection Revisions typically lead to acceptance High publication fees often imply high acceptance (but also possibly a predatory journal) View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Viewed 9k times 7 . 5 years? 2 years? Initial submission and been a while now hanging at ‘Editor Decision Started’ in one of the npg journals. No other comments on methodologies and technical contents were given. If we would have gotten a desk reject on the initial submission in a useful delay, I would have accepted the decision. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The last rejection was during the first months of covid quarantine and the darkest period of my life. You submitted the article, the editor did not feel it was a good fit, and they chose not to forward to reviewers, which is a choice editors make when they feel confident the article either is Felt like maybe I wasn’t cut out for this. The only way to get a long CV is to accumulate some rejections along the way. In the prior year, about 30% of the papers were on one of JOINs or TIME SERIES or GPUs. Or check it out in the app stores and got a rejection today with the offer to transfer the manuscript directly to a variety of other journals. Here is where it gets tricky, though, that 3rd meeting could be a purely technical interview or a culture fit test, or both. One should cite papers, not journals. grants, etc. Zu mir: 32m, Master Maschinenbau (1. Could be because they think the study is no good or that they think it is not relevant (for that journal) or that it is considered too low impact. Post any questions Desk rejects (what you received) boil down to 2 things: perceived quality fit If an editor believes that the paper isn’t good enough to be reviewed, they won’t bother wasting the time of an already stretched (volunteer) reviewer pool. For school, job, etc. Probably wouldn't hurt and reiterate that to whomever you speak to regarding any potential interviews. Personally I always give a reason, but clearly that may vary. (Postdoc in materials science in a European university) Because the rejections are invisible and the acceptances obvious, you can get a warped sense of how "bad" a rejection is. It's the "Maybe" that leaves you stuck in limbo. Sounds like a desk rejection. I forwarded it to my boss and jokingly said this is a really passive aggressive way to say you are unhappy with my performance r/MuleSoft is the official reddit gathering place for all things MuleSoft. If you need to, put the rejection and the MS aside for a week. Has anyone had this before? What can lead to this Understanding desk rejection is crucial for authors as it helps them identify common pitfalls in their submissions, align their research with journal aims, and improve their A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review. I had a manuscript submitted to Nature, and desk-rejected. Your perspective is crucial, and rejection is a harsh word for something that is part of the territory. Five rejections later (1 desk rejection, 4 proper reviews), we eventually settled for publishing in the standard archival journal in our field, which we probably could have done almost two years earlier if we'd have just gone there to start. Also important to distinguish between desk rejections and rejections after Unfortunately, I had a paper with a journal for about 2 months only to have it be desk rejected. they hope they'll get in but don't expect to) and very selective attention to impact by the editorial staff, rather than it being There was a doctoral student years ago who wore a dress at her defence that comprised of rejection letters. Desk rejection refers to the process where a submitted manuscript is rejected by the editor without being sent for peer review. I find it's better for one's well-being to actually start with a ranked list of journals to which to submit. I submitted a paper, and got an immediate desk reject as “out of scope”. I'm currently a few months in a 12 month probation right now and I'm considering to self reject myself on probation. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. A good example of why a paper might not get desk rejection but still not be publishable is the following. slo rkhe zadml wwandr rkb hgd iron lsgg ibjlg lmod